Follow me!
Gender Mystique

Logan the American Girl boy doll, continued.

2/28/2017

5 Comments

 
I am going to take my time figuring out the cultural meaning of American Girl's introduction of a boy character doll, because it is hard to interpret until the consumer response is clear. After all, I don't create the meaning, nor is the meaning inherent in the packaged and advertised product. 
Last week I did an interview with Kathryn Luttner of Campaign US, about Logan, and it was published yesterday. It's quite interesting, since she writes for an industry audience. I mentioned at the end of the interview that we'd be discussing Logan in my Fashion and Consumer Culture class, she was curious about what my students would have to say. Most of the discussion was more of a review of Grant McCracken's theory of meaning transfer from culture to consumer via consumption objects, so it isn't particularly relevant. But here is the interesting part:
Predictably, the male students (most in their early twenties) said they had never played with dolls. This is in contrast with my daughter (b. 1982) and son's (b. 1986) cohort, who played with boy Cabbage Patch Kids and My Buddy.

​We also had fun analyzing the CPK boy description from the 1993 J.C. Penney catalog. 
Picture
"Ruff 'n Tuff" play pal for boys. Dressed in non-removable play clothes". I pointed out that the earlier versions could be undressed and dressed. One discussion group decided that boys would certainly be harmed if they undressed a "boy" doll and discovered he had no penis. 

If a boy doll has no penis, he is not a boy and can not use men's bathrooms in conservative jurisdictions. If he does have a penis, and his clothes are not removable, his masculinity is like "a tree falling in a forest" with no one to hear. If his clothes can be removed (penis or no penis) he is encouraging cross-dressing and possibly homoerotic sexual curiosity. 
Poor American Girl! Caught between a rock and a hard place!​
5 Comments
Pax Ahimsa Gethen link
2/28/2017 11:08:06 am

I was born, and assigned female, in 1970, and as part of my doll collection I had a pair of what was branded as "anatomically correct" baby dolls; the boy doll did have a penis. I don't know if these dolls were marketed to boys as well as girls.

Though I've since transitioned to male, I am in some ways grateful for being raised as a girl in the 1970s and 80s, as I feel I got to experience a wider range of toys and clothing than I would have had I been assigned male. Though my parents were fairly liberal, I don't think they would have been comfortable letting me play with dolls and wear feminine clothing as a boy. (Now remembering the tune of "William Wants A Doll" from "Free to Be You and Me"...)

Reply
Jo
2/28/2017 01:54:41 pm

A friend and I were trying to remember that doll! Do you (or anyone) remember the brand?

Reply
Pax Ahimsa Gethen link
2/28/2017 02:17:18 pm

Sorry, I don't remember the brand. I couldn't have been older than 9 or 10 at the time. Though I'll admit I was older than that when I finally got a Cabbage Patch Kid! :-)

Reply
Jo
2/28/2017 02:42:44 pm

I am guessing a Mattel Baby Brother Tender Love.

M. G.
3/1/2017 01:17:03 am

Ideal Toy Company released the 'All in the Family' tie-in "Archie Bunker's Grandson" in 1976. Billed as the first anatomically correct baby boy doll to be released commercially.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Jo Paoletti

    Professor Emerita
    ​American Studies
    University of Maryland

    Picture
    Picture

    Archives

    February 2020
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    August 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    June 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010

    Categories

    All
    1920s
    1950s
    1960s
    1970s
    1980s
    Aging
    Ask Jo
    Baby Cards
    Baby Clothes
    Baby Dresses
    Beyond The Us
    Book 1
    Book 2
    Book 3
    Boys
    Button On Suit
    Button-on Suit
    Child Consumers
    Children And Consumers
    Children As Consumers
    Color Symbolism
    Creepers
    Culture Wars
    Design Details
    Dress Codes
    Dress Up Play
    Dress-up Play
    Ethnicity
    Fashion And Age
    Feminism
    Garment Details
    Gender Binary
    Girls
    Hair
    Layettes
    Men
    Middle Childhood
    Neutral
    Pants For Girls
    Pink
    Pink For Boys
    Prenatal Testing
    Princesses
    Que Sera Sera
    Rants
    Research
    Rompers
    Sexuality
    Stereotypes
    Teens
    Toddlers
    Tomboys
    Transgender
    Unisex
    Unisex. 1970s
    Women
    Writing Updates

Proudly powered by Weebly