Follow me!
Gender Mystique

The RompHim (TM) Part 3. The ungendered Case against rompers for anyone

6/5/2017

3 Comments

 
For my earlier posts on the RompHim (TM), see Part 1 and Part 2.
What is the appeal of rompers? The original rompers were designed as playclothes for infants and toddlers as a time when the standard clothing for children under the age of five years was dresses. Like dresses, rompers were one-piece, which was desirable for mothers who believed that children could be "spoiled" by too much handling. Compared with ankle-length skirts worn by young walkers, rompers allowed more freedom of movement. That's fine, but we now have many other options, and we no longer believe that babies are harmed by being handled in the process of getting dressed. But the image of romper as a childish style persisted, and has influenced adult casual wear. ​

Rompers, jumpsuits, overalls and the like all have a few advantages that make them attractive enough to appear in the fashion pages on a regular basis. They also have aesthetic and practical drawbacks that each generation seems destined to rediscover. To begin with the advantages:
First, one-piece dressing is appealing for those situations when time is of the essence. For example, when your lover's spouse arrives home unexpectedly, being able to step into your romper and zip it up before they reach the bedroom is literally a lifesaver. The second possible reason for its popularity is the romper's association with childhood, which renders it irresistible to consumers wishing to cultivate an air of childlike playfulness. This may be innocent or otherwise; there is an unfortunate tendency in adult fashion to adopt juvenile styles in a sexualized manner. Note that both of these reasons apply equally to all the known varieties of humans and have nothing to do with gender identity or expression, strictly speaking.

There are also ungendered reasons to reject the rompers.

First, whatever time is saved in dressing/undressing is made up in the bathroom. This has already been noted by many of the cleverer meme-ists on the internet. This has also been discovered by generations of parents who failed to get their offspring out of their rompers and onto the potty in time. Live and learn.

Second, for those of us who are taller than average, the vertical bifurcation of the romper is excruciating. Personally, I cannot look at the RompHim (TM) without thinking "ouch". There are ways to avoid this fitting issue, of course. They are usually ignored by manufacturers.

Third, separates are more versatile than one-piece garments. For the economically inclined, a matching pair of shorts and a shirt will get more use than a romper, because they can be combined with other tops and bottoms. Not everyone is as cheap as I am, of course, especially anyone ready to drop a few hundred dollars on a romper. Or a thousand or so.

Personally, I believe in the Theory of Generational Sartorial Darwinism (Copyright, Jo Paoletti). Your parents may tell you that linen wrinkles, or that rompers are literally a pain in the ass, but each generation must learn these lessons on their own. So buy a romper, or a RompHer, or a RompHim, and enjoy. 

What should not be done is judging someone else's clothing based on the wearer's age, sex, race, body type or other personal characteristics. I will explain why in Part 4.
3 Comments
Pax Ahimsa Gethen link
6/5/2017 10:31:38 am

I had no idea that one reason for one-piece clothes for infants was a belief that they could be "''spoiled'" by too much handling". Huh. Granted, I've never had kids myself...

As I've commented here before, I'm agender, and definitely agree that anyone of any gender should be able to wear whatever they please. But I'm guilty of snickering at adult rompers for the same reason I've snickered at adults wearing Crocs: I associate that style of clothing with children five-and-under. Gender has nothing to do with it.

Reply
Jo
6/5/2017 10:49:28 am

I am still mulling over the question of whether or not that flavor of ageism bothers me as much as gender policing. For now, I'd say it doesn't. Aesthetic, functional, economic and other impersonal objections are fair game in my book, because the standards are usually subjective and therefore arguable ad nauseum. This year's ugly style is next year's "strangely attractive"...

Reply
Pax Ahimsa Gethen link
6/5/2017 10:54:42 am

I agree, it's probably ageist of me to suggest adults look silly wearing clothing usually associated with children. Though I think my general dislike of children plays a factor in this. Although I do know quite a few people also dislike Crocs for purely aesthetic reasons, but that's a separate issue :-)


Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Jo Paoletti

    Professor Emerita
    ​American Studies
    University of Maryland

    Picture
    Picture

    Archives

    February 2020
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    August 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    June 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010

    Categories

    All
    1920s
    1950s
    1960s
    1970s
    1980s
    Aging
    Ask Jo
    Baby Cards
    Baby Clothes
    Baby Dresses
    Beyond The Us
    Book 1
    Book 2
    Book 3
    Boys
    Button On Suit
    Button-on Suit
    Child Consumers
    Children And Consumers
    Children As Consumers
    Color Symbolism
    Creepers
    Culture Wars
    Design Details
    Dress Codes
    Dress Up Play
    Dress-up Play
    Ethnicity
    Fashion And Age
    Feminism
    Garment Details
    Gender Binary
    Girls
    Hair
    Layettes
    Men
    Middle Childhood
    Neutral
    Pants For Girls
    Pink
    Pink For Boys
    Prenatal Testing
    Princesses
    Que Sera Sera
    Rants
    Research
    Rompers
    Sexuality
    Stereotypes
    Teens
    Toddlers
    Tomboys
    Transgender
    Unisex
    Unisex. 1970s
    Women
    Writing Updates

Proudly powered by Weebly