Follow me!
Gender Mystique

My Radio New South Wales interview.

3/26/2013

0 Comments

 
I've done a flurry of interviews -- three in under two weeks -- and all of them for radio stations on the other side of the world. Here is the last one, a short segment with Radio New South Wales in Australia. Enjoy!

For my friends in the Washington, DC area, I will be giving a "Pink and Blue" talk this afternoon at 4:30 at McKeldin Library on the U of Maryland campus.

I have learned so much since I finished the book, not only about gender and clothing but also about "common knowledge". If I only had a dollar for every time I've been asked if it's true that the colors "used to be the opposite". In the book, in every article I have written and in every talk and interview, I've been careful to explain that the current rule is unusually strict compared to the way pink and blue were used in the past, and that the rule was reversed in some places (Belgium, for example). In the US, there is a l-o-n-g period of time where there is no uniform rule, before the current symbolism is completely incorporated. Is it so difficult to imagine a world where pink and blue did not signify gender?

0 Comments

My Radio New Zealand interview

3/24/2013

0 Comments

 
My Radio New Zealand interview is now available online. It runs nearly 30 minutes. The host asked some very thoughtful questions. Enjoy!
0 Comments

Blue is NOT a spokescolor; pink is a spokescolor. 

3/21/2013

 
Here's a great post from Kyle Wiley of The Good Men Project (re-blogged via the Huffington Post, but hey, Arianna's rich enough). My favorite line:
It’s not just “a” girl color, but the international spokescolor (yes, a made up word) for the female gender.
Made up words are the best, because like all custom-made items, they fit better than the off-the-rack-versions. That is exactly the idea I have been trying to get across, less articulately, when I talk or write about pink and blue. Blue is NOT a spokescolor; pink is a spokescolor. Why is that, do you think? Is there something magical about pink itself? Mais non.

The magic is one of the oldest known superpowers: giving birth. Stay with me, friends. Here's how I see it: Women used to be powerful because they gave birth. The only way men could be more powerful than women was to control reproduction -- through marriage, through rape, through laws about birth control and abortion. But none of that transfered the magical power from women to men, so a cultural solution emerged instead. Make birth dirty, make sex a sin, make women dirty, weak sinners, lower than men because of their magic power.

Now all you have to do to maintain male superiority is make sure they are not tainted by anything remotely effete or feminine. Punish homosexuality. Raise little boys to be not-girls. Ridicule boys --and men-- who cry, or who are unathletic, or who like pink. It's a small price to pay for a place at the top of the social order.

Why have women put up with this? Many reasons, including a need to protect their offspring, their own survival and this complicated force called "hegemony", which results in acceptance of the dominant culture even when it works against you. (Kind of a cultural Stockholm syndrome.) But all is not lost; there are men and women, mothers and fathers, who believe that all humans have magical powers of love, imagination and creativity, and that humanity will benefit when every baby is valued for its potential to love, imagine and create, not its role in human reproduction.

Peace. (Steps off soapbox, returns to her index cards.)

No tuxedos for girls, 2013 edition.

3/19/2013

2 Comments

 
Maybe you thought we'd settled the pants-for-women question back in the 1970s. Think again! A high school in California is laying down the law: girls must wear gender-appropriate clothing for prom and for yearbook photos. Guess they never saw Marlene Dietrich in a tuxedo.
2 Comments

Time travel would be nice

3/13/2013

0 Comments

 
I sat in my home Tuesday evening doing a live Wednesday morning radio show. Yes, we're talking about Australia's Life Matters. The comments on the station's blog made me wish I had access to real time travel. The first takes the show to task for presenting my work as "news" when actor Stephen Fry had the same information on his quiz show Qi three years ago. The second commenter recalls an even older John Cleese film about pink and blue.

I love Fry and Cleese, and I think they are both well-read and well-informed. They might have done their own inquiry about pink and blue, but it's more likely they read or heard about it from someone who did the research. It could be me, since I've been writing articles and doing interviews about pink and blue for 30 years. It could also be British historian Clare Rose, who has done parallel work in the UK, or some uncredited media intern.

Oh, for a real time machine! A researcher could publish the results of years of research at the moment of the first discovery!

0 Comments

Girls' jeans and dress codes, 1972

3/7/2013

 
From the Perryville, Arkansas school dress code, 1972:

After checking in some stores and talking with parents concerning the girls' dress, we have decided to relax the code. We will allow jeans that are made for girls to be worn, providing:

If the jeans open in front, a tunic or square-tailed blouse must be worn to conceal the opening. If the jeans open on the side, then an ordinary blouse may be worn.
Picture
Oh, the horror of girls in fly-front jeans! (Sears, Fall 1972

Paper, please!

3/6/2013

0 Comments

 
For those of you who prefer the real, page-turning experience of ink on paper, but like your books flexible, light-weight and less expensive, I have excellent news. The paperback version of Pink and Blue has arrived at the publisher's warehouse. Click, order and it's a very short wait...
0 Comments

    Jo Paoletti

    Professor Emerita
    ​American Studies
    University of Maryland

    Picture
    Picture

    Archives

    February 2020
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    August 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    June 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010

    Categories

    All
    1920s
    1950s
    1960s
    1970s
    1980s
    Aging
    Ask Jo
    Baby Cards
    Baby Clothes
    Baby Dresses
    Beyond The Us
    Book 1
    Book 2
    Book 3
    Boys
    Button On Suit
    Button-on Suit
    Child Consumers
    Children And Consumers
    Children As Consumers
    Color Symbolism
    Creepers
    Culture Wars
    Design Details
    Dress Codes
    Dress Up Play
    Dress-up Play
    Ethnicity
    Fashion And Age
    Feminism
    Garment Details
    Gender Binary
    Girls
    Hair
    Layettes
    Men
    Middle Childhood
    Neutral
    Pants For Girls
    Pink
    Pink For Boys
    Prenatal Testing
    Princesses
    Que Sera Sera
    Rants
    Research
    Rompers
    Sexuality
    Stereotypes
    Teens
    Toddlers
    Tomboys
    Transgender
    Unisex
    Unisex. 1970s
    Women
    Writing Updates

Proudly powered by Weebly